Custom pricing
The structured-hiring ATS incumbents still standardize on.
View profileCheck fitRecruiting
The buyer job is leaving an ATS that became a compliance filing cabinet — and matching AI-native recruiting, sourcing, or hiring agents that still respect a real req process. Afterstack lists Greenhouse, Workday Recruiting, and Taleo next to Ashby, Eightfold, hireEZ, and XOR. Paradox is listed as a Workday product. Scored quiz live. Affiliates never change the order.
High-intent jobs mapped to the live quiz — not a sprawling taxonomy. Each page filters the catalog with the same use-case signals. Affiliates still never enter a rank.
Afterstack’s own bar — a shallow, high-intent category, not a sprawling directory taxonomy. Paid placement cannot buy a row.
Start from the system you already pay for. These are not quiz winners — they are the leave-candidates this category is built around.
Custom pricing
The structured-hiring ATS incumbents still standardize on.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
CRM-flavored ATS incumbent for talent pipelines.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Enterprise talent cloud incumbent — requisitions, compliance, and scale.
View profileCheck fitFrom $149/mo
SMB ATS incumbent with sourcing tools — now adding more AI on the same chassis.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Enterprise ATS inside Workday HCM — reqs that already live next to payroll.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
The legacy enterprise ATS many teams are still trying to leave.
View profileCheck fitFree plan
Enterprise talent acquisition suite — marketplace plus ATS.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Mid-market ATS incumbent — CRM, events, and reqs in one talent stack.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
The staffing-industry CRM/ATS incumbent — agencies, not software-company hiring.
View profileCheck fitEditorial AI-native score 8+, not an incumbent, and not already owned by an incumbent in this category. A pending acquisition stays in this crop and is labeled on the card. Catalog label, not a paid badge.
Talent intelligence platform — AI matching across hire, retain, and mobility.
View profileCheck fitAI sourcing and talent insights on a people graph, not just a job req.
View profileCheck fitAI talent experience platform — career site, matching, and CRM for employers.
View profileCheck fitAI sourcing platform — find candidates the ATS never saw.
View profileCheck fitTalent CRM and internal mobility — the pipeline after the ATS.
View profileCheck fitAI recruiting assistant that sources and sequences so recruiters do not live in Boolean.
View profileCheck fitAI recruiting assistant for high-volume hourly — text, schedule, screen.
View profileCheck fitProducts outside the independent AI-native crop, including mid-market tools and products an incumbent in this category already owns.
Custom pricing
Modern ATS with analytics and AI assist — the high-signal Greenhouse alternative.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Olivia, a conversational AI assistant for high-volume hiring.
Owned by Workday.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Sourcing CRM and outreach for recruiters living in LinkedIn and pipelines.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Recruiting automation for startups — jobs, outreach, and AI-assisted pipelines.
View profileCheck fitFrom $100/mo
Collaborative ATS for growing teams — Greenhouse energy without the enterprise quote.
View profileCheck fitFrom $75/mo
SMB applicant tracking — the ATS after a spreadsheet and before Greenhouse.
View profileCheck fitFree plan
Visual pipeline ATS for SMBs — kanban hiring without enterprise gravity.
View profileCheck fitCustom pricing
Structured hiring ATS from the UK — scorecards without Greenhouse’s price.
View profileCheck fitFrom $15/user/mo
AI-assisted ATS at an SMB price — CV parsing and matching without enterprise quotes.
View profileCheck fitSelective AI-native versus incumbent pages for this category. Affiliate programs never change the order.
Scored alternatives for the systems people leave in this category. The quiz rank does not read affiliate programs.
Applicant tracking, AI matching, sourcing, and hiring agents a team can actually run a req on. We stay at category level rather than a full HR taxonomy.
Yes. Same model as CRM, Support, and Sales engagement: fit is 0–100 against a perfect match, hard filters first, affiliates never scored. Use it when you know the ATS or hiring tool you want to leave.
No. Implementation partners are a separate Services category and are never passed into software scoring.
Start from Replace Greenhouse (scored) or the catalog, then open the Migration Agent. High-complexity cutovers can escalate to specialists without those firms entering the software rank.
Afterstack-owned answers to leave questions — not a cloned software directory.
All categories: categories · quizzes · search · methodology · guides