Skip to content
Afterstack
Menu

Quiz

Find the recruiting stack that should come next

Twelve questions. Fit is 0–100 against a perfect match. Hard filters drop products that cannot work. Affiliate status is never a scoring input.

What this quiz scores

These are the live inputs. A published score is 0–100 against a perfect match for your answers. Affiliate links are not an input.

  1. 1. What are you replacing? We will not recommend the ATS or hiring tool you are already trying to leave.
  2. 2. How big is the team that will live in it? A founder filling their first reqs and an enterprise TA floor fail in opposite ways.
  3. 3. What is the job this system has to do? Pick the work that would make you open it every day — ATS, matching, hiring agents, sourcing, or an agency desk.
  4. 4. What does hiring volume look like? Hourly frontline screening and selective professional hiring are different products wearing the same “recruiting” label.
  5. 5. How should recruiter email connect? An ATS that cannot see the inbox becomes a second job.
  6. 6. How much should AI do in recruiting? This is a hard filter if you say dealbreaker. We score AI-nativeness, not a copilot bolted onto scorecards.
  7. 7. When does it need to be live? Implementation speed is a scored attribute. An enterprise talent cloud loses if you need this week.
  8. 8. What is the monthly budget, roughly? List prices are starting points. Enterprise ATS quotes are treated as unconstrained.
  9. 9. Do you need a free plan to start? A free plan is a hard filter. A trial is not the same thing.
  10. 10. What does this have to talk to? Open APIs and marketplaces are catalog flags — not a paid boost.
  11. 11. Where does the data need to live? Self-host and compliance are hard filters when you require them.
  12. 12. Any single feature that is a dealbreaker? If you pick one, products without it are removed before scoring.

Default shortlist: replacing Greenhouse

15 products in this catalog name Greenhouse in their replaces list, which is the most common replacing choice here. Scores below are the live quiz for that path: What are you replacing? — Greenhouse; How big is the team that will live in it? — 51–200 people; What is the job this system has to do? — A real ATS — reqs, scorecards, structured hiring; What does hiring volume look like? — Selective professional / tech hiring; How should recruiter email connect? — Either is fine — just sync it; How much should AI do in recruiting? — Important — it should match, screen, or source; When does it need to be live? — This month; What is the monthly budget, roughly? — $20–60 per user; Do you need a free plan to start? — A free trial is enough; What does this have to talk to? — Must write back to HRIS / payroll via API; Where does the data need to live? — Cloud SaaS is fine; Any single feature that is a dealbreaker? — None — just rank the best fit. A different answer changes the order. This is not a paid ranking.

  1. 1 · score 78

    Ashby

    Modern ATS with analytics and AI assist — the high-signal Greenhouse alternative.

  2. 2 · score 76

    Recruitee

    Collaborative ATS for growing teams — Greenhouse energy without the enterprise quote.

  3. 3 · score 74

    Pinpoint

    Structured hiring ATS from the UK — scorecards without Greenhouse’s price.

  4. 4 · score 72

    Breezy HR

    Visual pipeline ATS for SMBs — kanban hiring without enterprise gravity.

  5. 5 · score 71

    Dover

    Recruiting automation for startups — jobs, outreach, and AI-assisted pipelines.

Best AI-native Greenhouse alternatives (2026)

Step 1 of 12

8%

What are you replacing?

We will not recommend the ATS or hiring tool you are already trying to leave.

What are you replacing?
Cancel