Quiz
Find the recruiting stack that should come next
Twelve questions. Fit is 0–100 against a perfect match. Hard filters drop products that cannot work. Affiliate status is never a scoring input.
What this quiz scores
These are the live inputs. A published score is 0–100 against a perfect match for your answers. Affiliate links are not an input.
- 1. What are you replacing? We will not recommend the ATS or hiring tool you are already trying to leave.
- 2. How big is the team that will live in it? A founder filling their first reqs and an enterprise TA floor fail in opposite ways.
- 3. What is the job this system has to do? Pick the work that would make you open it every day — ATS, matching, hiring agents, sourcing, or an agency desk.
- 4. What does hiring volume look like? Hourly frontline screening and selective professional hiring are different products wearing the same “recruiting” label.
- 5. How should recruiter email connect? An ATS that cannot see the inbox becomes a second job.
- 6. How much should AI do in recruiting? This is a hard filter if you say dealbreaker. We score AI-nativeness, not a copilot bolted onto scorecards.
- 7. When does it need to be live? Implementation speed is a scored attribute. An enterprise talent cloud loses if you need this week.
- 8. What is the monthly budget, roughly? List prices are starting points. Enterprise ATS quotes are treated as unconstrained.
- 9. Do you need a free plan to start? A free plan is a hard filter. A trial is not the same thing.
- 10. What does this have to talk to? Open APIs and marketplaces are catalog flags — not a paid boost.
- 11. Where does the data need to live? Self-host and compliance are hard filters when you require them.
- 12. Any single feature that is a dealbreaker? If you pick one, products without it are removed before scoring.
Default shortlist: replacing Greenhouse
15 products in this catalog name Greenhouse in their replaces list, which is the most common replacing choice here. Scores below are the live quiz for that path: What are you replacing? — Greenhouse; How big is the team that will live in it? — 51–200 people; What is the job this system has to do? — A real ATS — reqs, scorecards, structured hiring; What does hiring volume look like? — Selective professional / tech hiring; How should recruiter email connect? — Either is fine — just sync it; How much should AI do in recruiting? — Important — it should match, screen, or source; When does it need to be live? — This month; What is the monthly budget, roughly? — $20–60 per user; Do you need a free plan to start? — A free trial is enough; What does this have to talk to? — Must write back to HRIS / payroll via API; Where does the data need to live? — Cloud SaaS is fine; Any single feature that is a dealbreaker? — None — just rank the best fit. A different answer changes the order. This is not a paid ranking.
1 · score 78
Modern ATS with analytics and AI assist — the high-signal Greenhouse alternative.
2 · score 76
Collaborative ATS for growing teams — Greenhouse energy without the enterprise quote.
3 · score 74
Structured hiring ATS from the UK — scorecards without Greenhouse’s price.
4 · score 72
Visual pipeline ATS for SMBs — kanban hiring without enterprise gravity.
5 · score 71
Recruiting automation for startups — jobs, outreach, and AI-assisted pipelines.
Step 1 of 12
8%
What are you replacing?
We will not recommend the ATS or hiring tool you are already trying to leave.