Migration Agent
Add optional context, then the agent writes a detailed plan and coaches it step by step. The full plan stays on this page. Talk to a specialist or a matched services partner when the cutover is too heavy.
Product briefings are secondary. Greenhouse · Ashby
Checking Migration Agent…
Recommended services partners for Greenhouse → Ashby, matched on category and product tags. Paid profiles never change this list. Partners never enter a software rank.
Migration specialist
Custom pricing · unclaimed
Migration and adoption partner for teams whose switch is too complex for a DIY cutover — CRM, data, and AI programs.
Leaving Greenhouse · Recruiting stack
Migration · Ai Adoption · Crm Implementation
General guidance from the Afterstack catalog for Greenhouse → Ashby. Not Greenhouse or Ashby vendor documentation.
Export
Take Greenhouse as the source of truth for this pair. Export pipeline and deal records; synced email and calendar links; workflow rules; saved reports; installed marketplace apps; AI assistant configuration; records for the catalog use cases: ats. The structured-hiring ATS incumbents still standardize on.
Map
Load into Ashby only after the field map is written down. Modern ATS with analytics and AI assist — the high-signal Greenhouse alternative. Neither product is flagged for custom objects. Keep the object list short.
Prove a sample
Ashby scores 6/10 on speed to live and 6/10 on migration friendliness. Run one sample load and one report the team already uses in Greenhouse before a full cutover.
Cut over
Greenhouse scores 6/10 on migration friendliness and is marked high difficulty in the catalog. Keep Greenhouse readable until the team is working in Ashby. Greenhouse made structured hiring the default for scaled tech recruiting. Scorecards, interview kits, and a marketplace. AI features arrived later. This is the ATS many teams want to replace when the pain is speed, sourcing, or admin weight.
Linked sentences come from vendor documentation opened for this page. Everything else is general guidance, not Greenhouse or Ashby vendor documentation. This section does not move data and does not change the catalog outline above.
This cutover's Greenhouse source is the Harvest document at docs.greenhouse.io, which states that the API was built so a customer can take data out. Calls authenticate with HTTP Basic. The sample in the introduction is an HTTPS GET against harvest.greenhouse.io, version one, candidates. A credential can be minted only by someone whose developer permission is the ability to manage every API credential in the organization. The click-path in that document is Configure, then Dev Center, then API Credential Management. Each endpoint is granted entirely or not at all. There is no partial field scope in the paragraph that was read. Approved partners and integrations the customer builds receive a limit in the response header X-RateLimit-Limit, measured on a ten-second window. Help-center addresses that looked like a spreadsheet article answered 404. That is a dead URL, not a finding that Greenhouse lacks an on-screen export. Those 404s are not sources. Greenhouse's own pricing URL, read the same day, names Core, Plus, and Pro and asks for a demo. It does not print a software fee. The catalog's empty starting price matches. The catalog's trial flag does not match a page that never states a trial length.
Ashby's public price sheet is not an importer, and it is the Ashby page this pair could verify. It withholds a platform fee. Plan titles are Foundations, Plus, and Enterprise. Bands run through one hundred employees, from one hundred one to one thousand, and above one thousand, with an extra analytics product past one hundred employees. Annual commitments are written as ten percent less. Text messages beyond the include are ninety dollars for every thousand, on each plan column. Single sign-on is one hundred dollars a month, and only the Foundations column shows that line. Candidate intake on the sheet is a CSV or a forwarded resume. Opening intake is a CSV that can carry team, location, dates, and compensation. The screenshot of the table did not reveal which plan owns those two rows, so they stay unassigned. Credit allotments differ: fifteen hundred a month on Foundations, twenty-five hundred per seat each year on Plus, twelve thousand five hundred per seat each year on Enterprise, plus two hundred email lookups. The API reference calls the interface RPC, with paths shaped like a category and a method, mostly POST, JSON bodies, Content-Type application/json, and Basic auth using the key as the username and an empty password. It tells you not to call it from a browser, because CORS is not configured, and to proxy from your own backend. No sentence in that reference says the body is a Greenhouse Harvest candidate. The catalog's custom Ashby price matches the missing platform fee. A trial length was not on the sheet, despite the catalog trial flag.
Not in the documents opened on 2026-10-12. Ashby prints a CSV or forwarded-resume path for candidates and a CSV path for openings, without naming Greenhouse. Harvest is Greenhouse's export API. Bridging them is general guidance.
A user who can manage all of the organization's API credentials. The path is Configure, Dev Center, API Credential Management. Endpoint access is everything or nothing.
Not the platform fee. SMS is $90 per 1,000 on every column. Foundations SSO is $100 a month. Annual commitments are described as 10 percent less. The catalog's custom model matches the missing platform fee.
The reference says no. Use Basic auth with the key as the username and a blank password, send JSON, and proxy through a backend. CORS is not configured.
Last reviewed: 2026-10-12
Afterstack is not the vendor. This agent does not move data, does not authenticate to Greenhouse or Ashby, and does not sell a rank. Methodology.
